Untitled

  • ask me anything
  • submit a post
  • rss
  • archive
  • lensblr-network:


by 2janine.tumblr.com

    lensblr-network:

    by 2janine.tumblr.com

    Source: 2janine
    • 3 months ago
    • 296 notes
  • lensblr-network:

Confused Bird is confused.
by Christian B.  (austravel.tumblr.com)

    lensblr-network:

    Confused Bird is confused.

    by Christian B.  (austravel.tumblr.com)

    Source: austravel
    • 3 months ago
    • 181 notes
  • lensblr-network:

Macro flower
by Jodie Williams  (jojosphotos.tumblr.com)

    lensblr-network:

    Macro flower

    by Jodie Williams  (jojosphotos.tumblr.com)

    Source: jojosphotos
    • 3 months ago
    • 243 notes
  • lensblr-network:

Same place, different view.
by rharveyp.tumblr.com

    lensblr-network:

    Same place, different view.

    by rharveyp.tumblr.com

    Source: rharveyp
    • 3 months ago
    • 355 notes
  • sesamestreet:

It’s Monday morning, Elmo! Time to wake up!

    sesamestreet:

    It’s Monday morning, Elmo! Time to wake up!

    Source: sesamestreet
    • 3 months ago
    • 641 notes
  • #me #cute #sleepy #rose #room #love #pacarnyateguh  <3

    #me #cute #sleepy #rose #room #love #pacarnyateguh  <3

    • 3 months ago
  • #elmo #sesamestreet #love #cute #muppets

    #elmo #sesamestreet #love #cute #muppets

    • 3 months ago
  • scinerds:

Half a Million DVDs of Data Stored in Gram of DNA

Paleontologists routinely resurrect and sequence DNA from woolly mammoths and other long-extinct species. Future paleontologists, or librarians, may do much the same to pull up Shakespeare’s sonnets, listen to Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I have a dream” speech, or view photos. Researchers in the United Kingdom report today that they’ve encoded these works and others in DNA and later sequenced the genetic material to reconstruct the written, audio, and visual information.
The new work isn’t the first example of large-scale storage of digital information in DNA. Last year, researchers led by bioengineers Sriram Kosuri and George Church of Harvard Medical School reported that they stored a copy of one of Church’s books in DNA, among other things, at a density of about 700 terabits per gram, more than six orders of magnitude more dense than conventional data storage on a computer hard disk. Now, researchers led by molecular biologists Nick Goldman and Ewan Birney of the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) in Hinxton, U.K., report online today in Nature that they’ve improved the DNA encoding scheme to raise that storage density to a staggering 2.2 petabytes per gram, three times the previous effort.
To do so, the team first translated written words or other data into a standard binary code of 0s and 1s, and then converted this to a trinary code of 0s, 1s, and 2s—a step needed to help prevent the introduction of errors. The researchers then rewrote that data as strings of DNA’s chemical bases: As, Gs, Cs, and Ts. At the storage density achieved, a single gram of DNA would hold 2.2 million gigabits of information, or about what you can store in 468,000 DVDs. What’s more, the researchers also added an error correction scheme, encoding the information multiple times, among other tricks, to ensure that it could be read back with 100% accuracy.

    scinerds:

    Half a Million DVDs of Data Stored in Gram of DNA

    Paleontologists routinely resurrect and sequence DNA from woolly mammoths and other long-extinct species. Future paleontologists, or librarians, may do much the same to pull up Shakespeare’s sonnets, listen to Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I have a dream” speech, or view photos. Researchers in the United Kingdom report today that they’ve encoded these works and others in DNA and later sequenced the genetic material to reconstruct the written, audio, and visual information.

    The new work isn’t the first example of large-scale storage of digital information in DNA. Last year, researchers led by bioengineers Sriram Kosuri and George Church of Harvard Medical School reported that they stored a copy of one of Church’s books in DNA, among other things, at a density of about 700 terabits per gram, more than six orders of magnitude more dense than conventional data storage on a computer hard disk. Now, researchers led by molecular biologists Nick Goldman and Ewan Birney of the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) in Hinxton, U.K., report online today in Nature that they’ve improved the DNA encoding scheme to raise that storage density to a staggering 2.2 petabytes per gram, three times the previous effort.

    To do so, the team first translated written words or other data into a standard binary code of 0s and 1s, and then converted this to a trinary code of 0s, 1s, and 2s—a step needed to help prevent the introduction of errors. The researchers then rewrote that data as strings of DNA’s chemical bases: As, Gs, Cs, and Ts. At the storage density achieved, a single gram of DNA would hold 2.2 million gigabits of information, or about what you can store in 468,000 DVDs. What’s more, the researchers also added an error correction scheme, encoding the information multiple times, among other tricks, to ensure that it could be read back with 100% accuracy.

    Source: Wired
    • 3 months ago
    • 3548 notes
  • sesamestreet:

We could stare at these faces all day. And sometimes we actually do. It’s part of the job.

    sesamestreet:

    We could stare at these faces all day. And sometimes we actually do. It’s part of the job.

    Source: lmhworks
    • 3 months ago
    • 1317 notes
  • sesamestreet:

Friendship Week continues! Reblog this and Elmo will point to your name, so you can tell the world that Elmo loves you!

    sesamestreet:

    Friendship Week continues! Reblog this and Elmo will point to your name, so you can tell the world that Elmo loves you!

    Source: sesamestreet
    • 3 months ago
    • 2786 notes
© 2013 Untitled
Next page
  • Page 1 / 3